Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
JURITEXT000007518777 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing of Supporting Brief

Numéro de cause JURITEXT000007518777
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The civil party appealed a decision by the Chamber of Accusation upholding a refusal to prosecute an individual for premeditated abandonment of a client, active complicity by voluntary omission in a conviction, and perjury; however, the Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the personal brief supporting the appeal was not lodged with the registry of the Court of Appeal within the ten-day period stipulated by the Code of Criminal Procedure, meaning it could not legally be presented to the Court of Cassation by the appellant, who was not criminally convicted, except through a lawyer practicing before that court.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 585 DU MEME CODE, ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing of Supporting Brief: The civil party appealed a decision by the Chamber of Accusation upholding a refusal to prosecute an individual for premeditated abandonment of a client, active complicity by voluntary omission in a conviction, and perjury; however, the Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the personal brief supporting the appeal was not lodged with the registry of the Court of Appeal within the ten-day period stipulated by the Code of Criminal Procedure, meaning it could not legally be presented to the Court of Cassation by the appellant, who was not criminally convicted, except through a lawyer practicing before that court.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dépôt tardif code de procédure pénale recours contre décision de renvoi demande tardive de récusation relief intérêt pour agir

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 585 DU MEME CODE
The appeal is declared inadmissible because the personal memorandum was not timely filed with the Court of Appeal as required by Article 584 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, making it impossible to present to the Court of Cassation under Article 585.
ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
Cited as the basis for the procedural requirement that the personal memorandum was not timely filed with the Court of Appeal.
Généré par l'IA
90-82245
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Submission of Personal Brief
03-83759
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Improper Filing of Legal Briefs
86-42379
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Supporting Brief
94-85208
Civil Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing
92-83160
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing in Fraud Case

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 585 DU MEME CODE

The appeal is declared inadmissible because the personal memorandum was not timely filed with the Court of Appeal as required by Article 584 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, making it impossible to present to the Court of Cassation under Article 585.

ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

Cited as the basis for the procedural requirement that the personal memorandum was not timely filed with the Court of Appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR : Y... REMOND, PARTIE CIVILE, CONTRE UN ARRET RENDU LE 17 FEVRIER 1983 PAR LA CHAMBRE D'ACCUSATION DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE DIJON QUI A CONFIRME UNE ORDONNANCE DE REFUS D'INFORMER RENDUE LE 5 NOVEMBRE 1982 SUR L'ACTION DIRIGEE CONTRE MARTIN X... POUR ABANDON PREMEDITE DE CLIENT, PARTICIPATION ACTIVE PAR OMISSION VOLONTAIRE A UNE CONDAMNATION ET FAUX TEMOIGNAGE ;

VU LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL ;

ATTENDU QU'IL NE SAURAIT ETRE FAIT ETAT DU MEMOIRE PERSONNEL FIGURANT AU DOSSIER, MEMOIRE QUI, N'AYANT PAS ETE DEPOSE AU GREFFE DE LA COUR D'APPEL AYANT RENDU LES DECISIONS ATTAQUEES DANS LE DELAI DE DIX JOURS IMPARTI PAR L'ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, N'AURAIT PU, EN APPLICATION DES DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARTICLE 585 DU MEME CODE, ETRE PRESENTE DEVANT LA COUR DE CASSATION PAR LE DEMANDEUR, NON CONDAMNE PENALEMENT, QUE PAR LE MINISTERE D'UN AVOCAT EN CETTE COUR ;

PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE LE POURVOI IRRECEVABLE ;