Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Lack of Grounds and Untimely Supplementary Brief
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the appeal filing did not articulate any valid ground for cassation, and no supplementary brief was submitted within the mandatory deadline prescribed by the relevant procedural article, which mandates inadmissibility for failure to comply.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE R12-5 DU CODE DE L'EXPROPRIATION; Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Lack of Grounds and Untimely Supplementary Brief: The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the appeal filing did not articulate any valid ground for cassation, and no supplementary brief was submitted within the mandatory deadline prescribed by the relevant procedural article, which mandates inadmissibility for failure to comply.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACited as the sanction for failing to produce the amplifying brief within the prescribed time limit, leading to the inadmissibility of the appeal.
Texte complet
SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI : ATTENDU QUE LA DECLARATION DE POURVOI NE FORMULE AUCUN MOYEN REGULIER DE CASSATION ;
QU'AUCUN MEMOIRE AMPLIATIF N'A ETE PRODUIT DANS LE DELAI PRESCRIT, A PEINE D'IRRECEVABILITE, PAR L'ARTICLE R12-5 DU CODE DE L'EXPROPRIATION ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI ;