Appeal Inadmissibility in Expropriation Case (Meurthe-et-Moselle)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal was declared inadmissible because the statement of appeal failed to formulate any proper ground for quashing the decision, and no amplifying brief was filed within the time limit mandated by the relevant expropriation code, leading the court to reject the appeal against the order rendered by the expropriation judge concerning the department of Meurthe-et-Moselle.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE R12-5 DU CODE DE L'EXPROPRIATION; Appeal Inadmissibility in Expropriation Case (Meurthe-et-Moselle): The appeal was declared inadmissible because the statement of appeal failed to formulate any proper ground for quashing the decision, and no amplifying brief was filed within the time limit mandated by the relevant expropriation code, leading the court to reject the appeal against the order rendered by the expropriation judge concerning the department of Meurthe-et-Moselle.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACited as the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible due to the failure to file an amplifying brief within the prescribed time limit.
Texte complet
SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI : ATTENDU QUE LA DECLARATION DE POURVOI NE FORMULE AUCUN MOYEN REGULIER DE CASSATION ;
QU'AUCUN MEMOIRE AMPLIATIF N'A ETE PRODUIT DANS LE DELAI PRESCRIT, A PEINE D'IRRECEVABILITE, PAR L'ARTICLE R12-5 DU CODE DE L'EXPROPRIATION ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ORDONNANCE RENDUE LE 11 MAI 1982, PAR LE JUGE DE L'EXPROPRIATION DU DEPARTEMENT DE LA MEURTHE-ET-MOSELLE ;