Rejection of Appeal Based on Non-Existent Annulment
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA party argued that a prior appellate decision, which was the basis for the presently contested decision, was legally unfounded due to a subsequent annulment by the Court of Cassation, invoking Article 625 of the New Code of Civil Procedure. However, the Court of Cassation noted that the appeal directed against the subsequent decision had been declared inadmissible by a ruling issued the same day by its Second Civil Chamber, meaning the premise for the argument—the annulment of the later decision—was false. Therefore, the Court rejected the appeal against the original appellate decision because the supporting legal basis for the ground of appeal was lacking.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 625 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE; Rejection of Appeal Based on Non-Existent Annulment: However, the Court of Cassation noted that the appeal directed against the subsequent decision had been declared inadmissible by a ruling issued the same day by its Second Civil Chamber, meaning the premise for the argument—the annulment of the later decision—was false. Therefore, the Court rejected the appeal against the original appellate decision because the supporting legal basis for the ground of appeal was lacking.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACited by the appellant as the legal basis for cassation following the annulment of a prior decision, although ultimately rejected as the basis for the current appeal's success.
Texte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU, SELON LE MOYEN, QUE LA CASSATION A INTERVENIR DE L'ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS DU 22 AVRIL 1981 ENTRAINE LA PERTE DU FONDEMENT LEGAL DE L'ARRET DU 11 JUILLET 1979, PRESENTEMENT ATTAQUE, PAR APPLICATION DE L'ARTICLE 625 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE ;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE LE POURVOI, DIRIGE CONTRE L'ARRET DU 22 AVRIL 1981, A ETE DECLARE IRRECEVABLE PAR UN ARRET PRONONCE CE JOUR PAR LA DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE DE LA COUR DE CASSATION ;
D'OU IL SUIT QUE LE MOYEN MANQUE PAR LA CONDITION QUI LUI SERT DE BASE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 11 JUILLET 1979 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS ;