Possessory Action Based on Contractual Right of Way Trumps Extraneous Reasoning on Landlocked Status
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA litigant sought possessory protection based on a contractual right of way, but the appellate court's decision, which was challenged on appeal, contained reasoning related to the property being landlocked, which the higher court deemed superfluous because the claim was founded on a conventional servitude. Therefore, the Court of Cassation rejected the appeal, finding that the specific reasoning regarding enclosure did not affect the core basis of the possessory action, which was the established contractual right.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAPossessory Action Based on Contractual Right of Way Trumps Extraneous Reasoning on Landlocked Status: Therefore, the Court of Cassation rejected the appeal, finding that the specific reasoning regarding enclosure did not affect the core basis of the possessory action, which was the established contractual right.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE, TEL QU'IL FIGURE AU MEMOIRE AMPLIATIF ET CI-DESSUS REPRODUIT : ATTENDU QUE MME X... A FONDE SA DEMANDE DE PROTECTION POSSESSOIRE SUR UNE SERVITUDE CONVENTIONNELLE DE PASSAGE ;
QUE ,DES LORS, LA DECISION NE SAURAIT ETRE ATTEINTE PAR DES GRIEFS PORTANT SUR LES MOTIFS RELATIFS A L'ENCLAVE, QUI DOIVENT ETRE TENUS POUR SURABONDANTS ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 6 NOVEMBRE 1980 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE CAEN ;