Inadmissibility of Disqualification Request Due to Procedural and Tax Non-Compliance
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe request filed with the President of the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation seeking disqualification and referral of the appeal court proceeding due to legitimate suspicion, concerning charges of fraudulent use of blank endorsements and real estate transaction violations, was declared inadmissible because the filing failed to bear the required revenue stamp mandated by tax legislation for judicial submissions, and the filing party failed to prove that the request had been served upon all interested parties as required by the relevant procedural code.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 662 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, 879 DU CODE GENERAL DES IMPOTS; Inadmissibility of Disqualification Request Due to Procedural and Tax Non-Compliance: The request filed with the President of the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation seeking disqualification and referral of the appeal court proceeding due to legitimate suspicion, concerning charges of fraudulent use of blank endorsements and real estate transaction violations, was declared inadmissible because the filing failed to bear the required revenue stamp mandated by tax legislation for judicial submissions, and the filing party failed to prove that the request had been served upon all interested parties as required by the relevant procedural code.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACited as part of the legal basis for declaring the request inadmissible, specifically concerning the requirement for service on all interested parties.
Cited as part of the legal basis for declaring the request inadmissible, specifically concerning the requirement for the document to be stamped.
Texte complet
IRRECEVABILITE DE LA REQUETE AUX FINS DE DESSAISISSEMENT ET RENVOI POUR CAUSE DE SUSPICION LEGITIME, PRESENTEE PAR X... ETIENNE, PREVENU, DEVANT LA COUR D'APPEL D'AIX-EN-PROVENCE, D'ABUS DE BLANCS-SEINGS ET D'INFRACTIONS A LA LEGISLATION SUR LES TRANSACTIONS IMMOBILIERES. LA COUR, VU LES ARTICLES 662 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ET 879 DU CODE GENERAL DES IMPOTS;
ATTENDU QU'AUX TERMES DE L'ALINEA 1ER ET DU PARAGRAPHE 6° DE CE DERNIER TEXTE, SONT ASSUJETTIS AU TIMBRE, LES MINUTES, ORIGINAUX, COPIES, EXTRAITS ET EXPEDITIONS DES RECOURS, REQUETES ET MEMOIRES PRESENTES AUX TRIBUNAUX JUDICIAIRES OU A LEURS MEMBRES ;
ATTENDU QUE LA REQUETE DONT LE DEMANDEUR A SAISI LE PRESIDENT DE LA CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE DE LA COUR DE CASSATION N'EST PAS ETABLIE SUR TIMBRE ;
QU'AU SURPLUS X... NE JUSTIFIE PAS QUE LADITE REQUETE A ETE SIGNIFIEE A TOUTES LES PARTIES INTERESSEES, COMME L'EXIGE L'ALINEA 3 DE L'ARTICLE 662 SUSVISE DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ;
DECLARE LA REQUETE NON RECEVABLE