Appeal Regarding Warranty Obligations and Interpretation of Liability Release Rejected
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Court of Cassation rejected an appeal challenging a lower court decision, finding that the appellant's arguments, presented as claims of violation of warranty obligations and contradiction of reasoning, were merely an attempt to re-litigate the appellate court's interpretation of a declaration in which a party acknowledged knowledge of a report noting deficiencies and explicitly sought to release another party from any liability concerning those findings, concluding that the lower court sovereignly interpreted the operative document.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAAppeal Regarding Warranty Obligations and Interpretation of Liability Release Rejected: The Court of Cassation rejected an appeal challenging a lower court decision, finding that the appellant's arguments, presented as claims of violation of warranty obligations and contradiction of reasoning, were merely an attempt to re-litigate the appellate court's interpretation of a declaration in which a party acknowledged knowledge of a report noting deficiencies and explicitly sought to release another party from any liability concerning those findings, concluding that the lower court sovereignly interpreted the operative document.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE, TEL QU'IL EST ENONCE AU MEMOIRE AMPLIATIF ET REPRODUIT CI-DESSUS : ATTENDU QUE SOUS COUVERT DE GRIEFS NON FONDES DE VIOLATION DES PRINCIPES REGISSANT L'OBLIGATION DE GARANTIE DU VENDEUR ET DE CONTRADICTION DE MOTIFS, LE MOYEN NE TEND QU'A REMETTRE EN DISCUSSION L'INTERPRETATION SOUVERAINE DONNEE PAR LES JUGES D'APPEL A L'ACTE DANS LEQUEL M. Y... A DECLARE "ENSUITE DE LA VENTE CONSENTIE A SON PROFIT PAR MADAME Z..." AVOIR PRIS CONNAISSANCE DU PROCES-VERBAL CONSTATANT LA CARENCE DE M. X... ET DE MME A... ET ENTENDRE "DEGAGER MME Z... DE TOUTE RESPONSABILITE A CE PROPOS" ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 7 JUILLET 1981 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE ROUEN ;