Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
80-13453 Généré par l'IA

Inadmissibility of Second Cassation Appeal After Abandonment

Numéro de cause 80-13453
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court declared the appeal inadmissible because a party who has already filed an appeal in cassation against a specific decision is no longer entitled to file a second appeal concerning the same decision, and in this instance, a party filed a second appeal on June 19, 1980, against a court of appeal decision from October 26, 1978, after having already been declared to have abandoned their initial appeal filed on December 18, 1978, against that same decision on June 24, 1980, thus violating the rule established by Article 621 of the new Code of Civil Procedure.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 621 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE; Inadmissibility of Second Cassation Appeal After Abandonment: The court declared the appeal inadmissible because a party who has already filed an appeal in cassation against a specific decision is no longer entitled to file a second appeal concerning the same decision, and in this instance, a party filed a second appeal on June 19, 1980, against a court of appeal decision from October 26, 1978, after having already been declared to have abandoned their initial appeal filed on December 18, 1978, against that same decision on June 24, 1980, thus violating the rule established by Article 621 of the new Code of Civil Procedure.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
article du CPC ordonnance de non-entrée en matière règlement intérieur motifs de cassation recours contre décision de renvoi retrait de la décision administrative

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 621 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE
This article was cited as the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible because a new appeal was filed against the same decision after a prior appeal was dismissed.
Généré par l'IA
95-17449
Inadmissibility of Second Cassation Appeal
06-44279
Inadmissibility of Second Identical Appeal
03-48090
Inadmissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Ruling and Untimely Filing of Grounds for Cassation
88-70198
Inadmissibility of Second Appeal Against Identical Expropriation Order
93-16085
Double Appeal Inadmissibility

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 621 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE

This article was cited as the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible because a new appeal was filed against the same decision after a prior appeal was dismissed.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI, EXAMINEE D'OFFICE : VU L'ARTICLE 621 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE ;

ATTENDU QUE LA PARTIE QUI A FORME UN RECOURS EN CASSATION N'EST PLUS RECEVABLE A EN FORMER UN NOUVEAU CONTRE LA MEME DECISION ;

ATTENDU QUE LA SOCIETE UNILOR A FORME, LE 18 DECEMBRE 1978, CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE NANCY DU 26 OCTOBRE 1978, UN POURVOI EN CASSATION DONT ELLE A ETE DECLAREE DECHUE PAR UN ARRET DE LA COUR DE CASSATION DU 24 JUIN 1980 ;

QUE LA SOCIETE UNILOR S'EST A NOUVEAU POURVUE CONTRE LE MEME ARRET LE 19 JUIN 1980 ;

QUE CE NOUVEAU POURVOI EST IRRECEVABLE ;

PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME LE 19 JUIN 1980 PAR LA SOCIETE UNILOR CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 26 OCTOBRE 1978 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE NANCY.