Appeal Dismissed Due to Loss of Interest After Guarantee Fund Assumed Liability
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA party appealed a decision that awarded them damages against a notary but rejected their claim for warranty against the regional professional guarantee fund. The appellate court found that the guarantee fund, in a subsequent filing, waived its right to rely on the appealed judgment and agreed to cover the condemnation against the notary, and since the complaining party acknowledged that this commitment was fulfilled to their benefit, the appealed decision was no longer prejudicial to the appellant, leading the court to rule there was no need to rule on the appeal due to a loss of interest.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IADIT N'Y AVOIR LIEU A STATUER; Appeal Dismissed Due to Loss of Interest After Guarantee Fund Assumed Liability: The appellate court found that the guarantee fund, in a subsequent filing, waived its right to rely on the appealed judgment and agreed to cover the condemnation against the notary, and since the complaining party acknowledged that this commitment was fulfilled to their benefit, the appealed decision was no longer prejudicial to the appellant, leading the court to rule there was no need to rule on the appeal due to a loss of interest.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis phrase in the dispositive indicates the court's decision not to rule on the merits because the appeal had become moot (sans objet).
Texte complet
ATTENDU QUE M X... FAIT GRIEF A L'ARRET ATTAQUE D'AVOIR, TOUT EN CONDAMNANT M Y..., NOTAIRE, A LUI PAYER LA SOMME DE 55000 FRANCS A TITRE DE DOMMAGES INTERETS, REJETE L'ACTION EN GARANTIE QU'IL AVAIT ENGAGEE CONTRE LA CAISSE REGIONALE DE GARANTIE DES NOTAIRES DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE TOULOUSE ;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE, PAR MEMOIRE EN DATE DU 6 DECEMBRE 1982, LADITE CAISSE DE GARANTIE A DECLARE RENONCER A SE PREVALOIR DE L'ARRET ATTAQUE ET S'EST ENGAGEE A GARANTIR M X... DE LA CONDAMNATION PRONONCEE CONTRE M Y... QUI RECONNAIT QUE CET ENGAGEMENT A ETE EXECUTE A SON PROFIT ;
QUE, DES LORS, L'ARRET ATTAQUE N'EST PLUS DE NATURE A NUIRE AU DEMANDEUR AU POURVOI ;
QU'IL S'ENSUIT QUE, FAUTE D'INTERET, LE POURVOI EST DEVENU SANS OBJET ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : DIT N'Y AVOIR LIEU A STATUER ;