Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
83-60535 Généré par l'IA

Electoral Roll Removal Appeal Inadmissibility

Numéro de cause 83-60535
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenging a decision to remove them from an electoral roll appealed on the grounds that the removal unjustly deprived them of voting rights, despite having been duly notified to appear before the lower court for their registration request; however, the appellate court declared the appeal inadmissible because the decision to strike the case from the docket, being an administrative measure that does not preclude the continuation of the proceedings, is not subject to review by the highest court.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE L 27 DU CODE ELECTORAL, DECISION DE RADIATION DU ROLE; Electoral Roll Removal Appeal Inadmissibility: A party challenging a decision to remove them from an electoral roll appealed on the grounds that the removal unjustly deprived them of voting rights, despite having been duly notified to appear before the lower court for their registration request; however, the appellate court declared the appeal inadmissible because the decision to strike the case from the docket, being an administrative measure that does not preclude the continuation of the proceedings, is not subject to review by the highest court.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
élection dans le cadre des droits politiques droit d'enlèvement non soumis à obligation d'inscription latoisage contentieux électoral droit de grève

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE L 27 DU CODE ELECTORAL
This article was cited by the appellant as the basis for their grievance, but the court ruled on admissibility concerning the decision itself, not the substance of this electoral code article.
DECISION DE RADIATION DU ROLE
The court declared the appeal inadmissible because the challenged decision was merely a measure of judicial administration (radiation du rôle) which does not prevent the continuation of the instance.
Généré par l'IA
76-60071
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Procedural Non-Compliance in Electoral Roll Removal Case
93-60193
Electoral Roll Removal Notification Dispute
80-60147
Appeal Regarding Electoral Roll Removal Deemed Inadmissible Due to Defective Grounds
95-60459
Elector Removal Appeal Inadmissibility
JURITEXT000007079239
Electoral Roll Appeal Admissibility on Procedural Grounds

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE L 27 DU CODE ELECTORAL

This article was cited by the appellant as the basis for their grievance, but the court ruled on admissibility concerning the decision itself, not the substance of this electoral code article.

DECISION DE RADIATION DU ROLE

The court declared the appeal inadmissible because the challenged decision was merely a measure of judicial administration (radiation du rôle) which does not prevent the continuation of the instance.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

ATTENDU QUE, SUR LE FONDEMENT DE L'ARTICLE L 27 DU CODE ELECTORAL, M PHILIPPE X... FAIT GRIEF AU JUGEMENT ATTAQUE DE TENDRE A SA RADIATION DE LA LISTE ELECTORALE DE LA COMMUNE DE COUVRON, CE QUI LE PRIVERAIT INJUSTEMENT DE LA POSSIBILITE DE VOTER ;

MAIS ATTENDU QU'IL RESULTE DU JUGEMENT QUE CE CITOYEN, AYANT DEMANDE AU TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE SON INSCRIPTION SUR LADITE LISTE, A ETE AVISE, LE 21 JANVIER 1983, D'AVOIR A SE PRESENTER A L'AUDIENCE DU 27 JANVIER, DATE A LAQUELLE, EN SON ABSENCE, NON JUSTIFIEE, ET FAUTE D'ELEMENTS POUR INSTRUIRE LA DEMANDE, UNE DECISION DE RADIATION DU ROLE A ETE PRISE ;

ET ATTENDU QU'UNE DECISION DE RADIATION DU ROLE, MESURE D'ADMINISTRATION JUDICIAIRE QUI EMPORTE RETRAIT DE L'AFFAIRE DU RANG DES AFFAIRES EN COURS ET NE FAIT PAS OBSTACLE A LA POURSUITE DE L'INSTANCE, NE PEUT PAS ETRE DEFEREE A LA COUR DE CASSATION ;

DECLARE, EN CONSEQUENCE, IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE LE JUGEMENT RENDU LE 27 JANVIER 1983 PAR LE TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE LAON.