Electoral Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Defective Mandate
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court declared an appeal inadmissible because the filing of the appeal in cassation, which must be made either by the applicants in person or by a representative holding a special power of attorney according to the Electoral Code and a 1967 decree, was made by an individual claiming to be the "authorized representative" of a local trade union federation who only provided a general mandate for legal representation, failing to furnish the specific special mandate required by law for such an appeal.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE L. 27 DU CODE ELECTORAL, ARTICLE 24, ALINEA 2, DU DECRET N. 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967; Electoral Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Defective Mandate: The court declared an appeal inadmissible because the filing of the appeal in cassation, which must be made either by the applicants in person or by a representative holding a special power of attorney according to the Electoral Code and a 1967 decree, was made by an individual claiming to be the "authorized representative" of a local trade union federation who only provided a general mandate for legal representation, failing to furnish the specific special mandate required by law for such an appeal.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis article, along with Art. 24 al. 2 of the Decree of December 22, 1967, establishes the requirement for a special power of attorney for filing an appeal in cassation, which was lacking here, leading to the declaration of inadmissibility.
This article, along with Art. L. 27 of the Electoral Code, establishes the requirement for a special power of attorney for filing an appeal in cassation, which was lacking here, leading to the declaration of inadmissibility.
Texte complet
SUR LA RECEVABILITE :
VU L'ARTICLE L. 27 DU CODE ELECTORAL ET L'ARTICLE 24, ALINEA 2, DU DECRET N. 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967;
ATTENDU QU'EN APPLICATION DE CES TEXTES, LE POURVOI EN CASSATION EST FORME PAR SIMPLE REQUETE QUI DOIT EMANER DES DEMANDEURS EN PERSONNE OU D'UN MANDATAIRE MUNI D'UN POUVOIR SPECIAL A CET EFFET; ATTENDU QUE LA DECLARATION DE POURVOI A ETE FAITE LE 2 AVRIL 1979 AU GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE D'ANTONY PAR ANTOINE X..., AGISSANT EN QUALITE DE < REPRESENTANT HABILITE > DE L'UNION LOCALE DES SYNDICATS CGT DE BAGNEUX; ATTENDU QUE X..., QUI NE PRETEND PAS ETRE REPRESENTANT STATUTAIRE DE CETTE ORGANISATION SYNDICALE, A PRODUIT L'EXTRAIT D'UNE DELIBERATION DE LA COMMISSION EXECUTIVE ET DU BUREAU DE CELLE-CI EN DATE DU 21 OCTOBRE 1978, PAR LAQUELLE LUI A ETE CONFIE UN MANDAT GENERAL DE REPRESENTATION EN JUSTICE; QU'IL N'A PAS JUSTIFIE, EN CONSEQUENCE, DU MANDAT SPECIAL EXIGE PAR LES TEXTES SUSVISES; D'OU IL SUIT QUE LE POURVOI EST IRRECEVABLE;
PAR CES MOTIFS :
DECLARE IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ORDONNANCE DE REFERE DU TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE D'ANTONY EN DATE DU 19 MARS 1979.