Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
72-13557 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Prior Judgment on Merits

Numéro de cause 72-13557
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

In an action by a primary sickness insurance fund to recover unduly overpaid daily benefits, a first instance commissioner ordered an investigation on May 24, 1971, which was notified to the fund on May 22, 1971, as a decision rendered at first instance; the fund appealed this decision on July 15, 1971, and subsequently filed an appeal to the highest court on August 21, 1972, while the Court of Appeal had already ruled on the merits of the case on November 19, 1971, following the fund's appeal without the regularity of that appeal being contested; consequently, the direct appeal to the highest court against the initial commissioner's decision, seeking to challenge the validity of the Court of Appeal's jurisdiction which the latter had implicitly accepted, was declared inadmissible because the matter had proceeded to a judgment on the merits in the appellate court.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Prior Judgment on Merits: In an action by a primary sickness insurance fund to recover unduly overpaid daily benefits, a first instance commissioner ordered an investigation on May 24, 1971, which was notified to the fund on May 22, 1971, as a decision rendered at first instance; the fund appealed this decision on July 15, 1971, and subsequently filed an appeal to the highest court on August 21, 1972, while the Court of Appeal had already ruled on the merits of the case on November 19, 1971, following the fund's appeal without the regularity of that appeal being contested; consequently, the direct appeal to the highest court against the initial commissioner's decision, seeking to challenge the validity of the Court of Appeal's jurisdiction which the latter had implicitly accepted, was declared inadmissible because the matter had proceeded to a judgment on the merits in the appellate court.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations indûment perçues assurance d'une indemnité journalière enquête préalable caisse d'assurance assurance directe qualité pour recourir
Généré par l'IA
09-11355
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Non-Final Judgment on Merits
JURITEXT000006941488
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Non-Final Judgment on Principal Claim
90-21120
Health Insurance Fund v. Social Security Tribunal (Inadmissibility of Appeal on Competence)
99-18068
Health Insurance Fund Coverage Appeal Inadmissibility
503896
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Lack of Legal Representation

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI : ATTENDU QUE SUR L'ACTION EN REMBOURSEMENT ENGAGEE PAR LA CAISSE PRIMAIRE D'ASSURANCE-MALADIE DES BOUCHES-DU-RHONE CONTRE BOBIN QUI AVAIT PERCU DES INDEMNITES JOURNALIERES INDUMENT MAJOREES, LE COMMISSAIRE DE PREMIERE INSTANCE DE TOULOUSE A ORDONNE LE 24 MAI 1971 UNE MESURE D'INFORMATION TENDANT A VERIFIER LE MODE DE CALCUL DESDITES PRESTATIONS ;

QUE CETTE DECISION A ETE NOTIFIEE LE 22 MAI 1971 A LA CAISSE PRIMAIRE COMME AYANT ETE RENDUE EN PREMIER RESSORT ;

QU'APRES EN AVOIR REGULIEREMENT RELEVE APPEL LE 15 JUILLET SUIVANT, CET ORGANISME A FORME UN POURVOI LE 21 AOUT 1972 ;

QU'ENTRE TEMPS LA COUR D'APPEL DE TOULOUSE AVAIT STATUE SUR LE FOND PAR ARRET DU 19 NOVEMBRE 1971 EN EXAMINANT L'APPEL FORME PAR LA CAISSE PRIMAIRE SANS QU'AUCUNE DES PARTIES N'EN EUT CONTESTE LA REGULARITE NI CRITIQUE LE PRINCIPE DU CARACTERE INDETERMINE DE LA DEMANDE ;

QU'EN CONSEQUENCE LE POURVOI FORME DIRECTEMENT PAR LA CAISSE CONTRE LA DECISION DE LA COMMISSION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE ET TENDANT A REMETTRE EN QUESTION LA VALIDITE DE LA SAISINE DE LA COUR D'APPEL CONTRAIREMENT A CE QUE CELLE-CI AVAIT IMPLICITEMENT JUGE NE PEUT ETRE ACCUEILLI ;

QU'AINSI LE POURVOI N'EST PAS RECEVABLE ;

PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE LA DECISION RENDUE LE 24 MAI 1971 PAR LA COMMISSION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE DE TOULOUSE.