Family Allowance Eligibility During Vacation Employment
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal challenged the granting of family allowances for a student during July and August 1970, despite the student having worked as a trainee stevedore, based on a regulation stating that continued studies are incompatible with any salaried employment. The appellate court justified its decision by finding that the work performed during the school vacation did not harm the student's health, the wages earned were below the authorized quarterly minimum, the activity had an educational rather than professional character, and it remained compatible with the continuation of studies, thereby rejecting the claim that the student forfeited the right to benefits.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAFamily Allowance Eligibility During Vacation Employment: The appellate court justified its decision by finding that the work performed during the school vacation did not harm the student's health, the wages earned were below the authorized quarterly minimum, the activity had an educational rather than professional character, and it remained compatible with the continuation of studies, thereby rejecting the claim that the student forfeited the right to benefits.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis article was cited in the grounds of appeal concerning the incompatibility of continued studies with salaried employment, which the Court rejected.
Texte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QU'IL EST FAIT GRIEF A LA DECISION ATTAQUEE D'AVOIR ACCORDE A DAME X..., PENDANT LES MOIS DE JUILLET ET AOUT 1970, LE BENEFICE DES ALLOCATIONS FAMILIALES POUR SON Y... HUBERT, BIEN QUE CELUI-CI EUT EXERCE PENDANT CETTE PERIODE UNE ACTIVITE SALARIEE EN QUALITE DE MANUTENTIONNAIRE STAGIAIRE, ALORS QU'AUX TERMES DE L'ARTICLE 8 DU REGLEMENT INTERIEUR MODELE DES CAISSES D'ALLOCATIONS FAMILIALES, LA POURSUITE DES ETUDES EST INCOMPATIBLE AVEC L'EXERCICE DE TOUT EMPLOI SALARIE ;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE LES JUGES DU FOND ONT CONSTATE QUE LE TRAVAIL EXERCE PENDANT LES VACANCES SCOLAIRE PAR HUBERT X... N'AVAIT PAS ETE PREJUDICIABLE A SA SANTE QUE LE SALAIRE PERCU AVAIT ETE INFERIEUR AU MINIMUM TRIMESTRIEL AUTORISE, QUE CETTE ACTIVITE DE L'INTERESSE AVAIT EU UN CARACTERE EDUCATIF ET NON PROFESSIONNEL ET QU'ELLE AVAIT ETE COMPATIBLE AVEC LA POURSUITE DE SES ETUDES ;
QUE LA COMMISSION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE A AINSI JUSTIFIE SA DECISION ;
D'OU IL SUIT QUE LE MOYEN N'EST PAS FONDE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE LA DECISION RENDUE LE 22 AVRIL 1971, PAR LA COMMISSION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE DE DOUAI