Servitude of Support Prescription Appeal

A party, having been found liable for damages following the collapse of a structure, appealed on the grounds that the lower court improperly applied the law regarding the necessary time period for a servitude of support to be established by prescription, arguing that the necessary duration had not been met. The high court rejected the appeal, affirming that the lower court correctly determined that the established facts met the legal criteria for the prescriptive acquisition of the servitude of support, thereby upholding the finding of liability.