Tenant Eviction Upheld Following Dismissed Opposition and Related Judgment Confirmation
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe case concerns an appeal against a decision that confirmed an opposition rejection and ordered the eviction of a tenant following two enforcement orders for payment issued at the request of the landlord. The appellate court's decision was based on a prior judgment rendered the same day between the same parties, which ordered the appellant to pay the amounts claimed in the enforcement orders, and the court noted that the appeal against that initial judgment had already been dismissed on appeal. Consequently, the first branch of the appeal, which hinged on the hypothetical cassation of the related judgment, was deemed moot due to the failure of its underlying condition, and the remaining branches of the appeal, which repeated arguments already rejected in the dismissed appeal, were declared inadmissible because they indirectly challenged the unappealed initial judgment.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAPAR CES MOTIFS; Tenant Eviction Upheld Following Dismissed Opposition and Related Judgment Confirmation: The appellate court's decision was based on a prior judgment rendered the same day between the same parties, which ordered the appellant to pay the amounts claimed in the enforcement orders, and the court noted that the appeal against that initial judgment had already been dismissed on appeal. Consequently, the first branch of the appeal, which hinged on the hypothetical cassation of the related judgment, was deemed moot due to the failure of its underlying condition, and the remaining branches of the appeal, which repeated arguments already rejected in the dismissed appeal, were declared inadmissible because they indirectly challenged the unappealed initial judgment.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis phrase introduces the dispositive section where the final decision to reject the appeal is made.
Texte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE PRIS EN SA PREMIERE BRANCHE : ATTENDU QUE POUR CONFIRMER LE JUGEMENT ENTREPRIS QUI AVAIT REPOUSSE L'OPPOSITION FORMEE PAR LA SOCIETE "IDEAL COIFFEUR", APPELLANTE, A DEUX COMMANDEMENTS A ELLE SIGNIFIES A LA REQUETE DE LA SOCIETE RAUMON, INTIMEE, ET ORDONNE L'EXPULSION DE LA PREMIERE DES LIEUX QU'ELLE TENAIT A BAIL DE LA SECONDE, L'ARRET ATTAQUE SE REFERE A UN PRECEDENT ARRET, RENDU LE MEME JOUR ENTRE LES MEMES PARTIES ET PORTANT CONDAMNATION DE LA SOCIETE APPELANTE A PAYER A LA SOCIETE INTIMEE, LA SOMME RECLAMEE PAR LES COMMANDEMENTS LITIGIEUX;
ATTENDU QUE, PAR DECISION DU 8 MAI 1961, LA CHAMBRE CIVILE A REJETE LE POURVOI FORME AU NOM DE LA SOCIETE "IDEAL COIFFEUR" EN CASSATION DU PREMIER ARRET PORTANT CONDAMNATION A SON ENCONTRE;
ATTENDU DES LORS, QUE LE MOYEN PRIS DE LA CONSEQUENCE DE LA CASSATION EVENTUELLE DUDIT ARRET, EST DEPOURVU D'OBJET PAR LA DEFAILLANCE DE LA CONDITION QUI LUI SERT DE BASE;
SUR LE MOYEN PRIS EN SES AUTRES BRANCHES: ATTENDU QUE CE MOYEN REPRODUIT LITTERALEMENT DES GRIEFS ENONCES AU MOYEN UNIQUE PRIS A L'APPUI DU POURVOI REJETE PAR LA DECISION PRECITEE;
ATTENDU, DES LORS, QUE CES GRIEFS DEJA ECARTES PAR LADITE DECISION ET TENDANT INDIRECTEMENT A LA CENSURE DU PREMIER ARRET QUI N'EST PAS ATTEINT PAR LE PRESENT POURVOI, SONT IRRECEVABLES;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 22 JANVIER 1959 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS.