Failure to Serve Electoral Appeal Timely
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal was deemed inadmissible because the appellant failed to comply with the essential procedural requirement mandated by the electoral code, which necessitates notifying the opposing parties of the appeal within the prescribed timeframe. Specifically, the appellant did not demonstrate that the appeal against the judgment of the lower court was served upon the individual who was incorrectly named as a party in the electoral dispute proceedings within the statutory deadline, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as inadmissible.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 29 DU CODE ELECTORAL; Failure to Serve Electoral Appeal Timely: Specifically, the appellant did not demonstrate that the appeal against the judgment of the lower court was served upon the individual who was incorrectly named as a party in the electoral dispute proceedings within the statutory deadline, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as inadmissible.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis article establishes the essential formality (denunciation of the appeal) which was not observed, leading to the inadmissibility of the appeal.
Texte complet
SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI : ATTENDU QUE LA DENONCIATION DU POURVOI AUX DEFENDEURS PRESCRITE PAR L'ARTICLE 29 DU CODE ELECTORAL CONSTITUE UNE FORMALITE ESSENTIELLE QUI DOIT ETRE OBSERVEE MEME A L'EGARD DE CELUI QUI A ETE ILLEGALEMENT PARTIE DEVANT LE JUGE DU CONTENTIEUX ELECTORAL ;
ATTENDU QUE LE DEMANDEUR NE JUSTIFIE PAS AVOIR DENONCE DANS LE DELAI DE LA LOI AU SIEUR Y..., ADJOINT AU MAIRE DE FONTRABIOUSE, APPELANT DE LA DECISION DE LA COMMISSION MUNICIPALE DE LADITE COMMUNE, LE POURVOI QU'IL A FORME CONTRE LE JUGEMENT DU TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE PRADES ;
DECLARE, EN CONSEQUENCE, LE POURVOI IRRECEVABLE. (TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE PRADES, 3 JANVIER 1961). NO 61-60.005. X... PIERRE. PRESIDENT : M. CAMBOULIVES, CONSEILLER DOYEN FAISANT FONCTIONS. RAPPORTEUR : M. BOURCELIN. AVOCAT GENERAL : M. LEMOINE.