Construction Contract Damages Appeal Regarding Expert Testimony Admissibility

A party appealed a decision that found them liable for damages stemming from the execution of a construction contract, arguing the lower court improperly relied on expert testimony that had not been officially submitted to the court file. The Court of Cassation rejected the appeal, reasoning that the lower court's decision was sufficiently based on established facts and evidence already present in the record, including the expert's findings, regardless of the formal inclusion method, thereby validating the factual findings underpinning the damages award.