Property Sale Withdrawal Based on Stipulation Pour Autrui Validity

An individual entered into a contract to purchase property with an attached commercial lease, but later attempted to withdraw from the sale by invoking a stipulation pour autrui in the lease, claiming it benefited a third party that was not actually a party to the sale agreement, leading to a dispute over the enforceability of the withdrawal. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that a stipulation pour autrui must clearly benefit a third party and that in this instance, the clause relied upon did not sufficiently establish a third-party beneficiary right in favor of the claimed party in the context of the specific property sale contract, thus the withdrawal attempt based on that clause was invalid.