Electoral Appeal Inadmissible Due to Improper Notification Method
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal concerning an electoral matter was declared inadmissible because the appellant failed to adhere to the mandatory procedural requirement set forth in the Electoral Code, which dictates that the notification of the appeal to the defendant must be made exclusively by registered letter. Although the law does not preclude the establishment of a formal record by a public officer attesting to the notification, it strictly limits the method of notification itself to that prescribed form, and since the notification in this case was performed solely through a court bailiff, the statutory condition for admissibility was not met.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 29 DU CODE ELECTORAL; Electoral Appeal Inadmissible Due to Improper Notification Method: Although the law does not preclude the establishment of a formal record by a public officer attesting to the notification, it strictly limits the method of notification itself to that prescribed form, and since the notification in this case was performed solely through a court bailiff, the statutory condition for admissibility was not met.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal was declared inadmissible because the notification procedure required by this article (simple registered letter) was not followed.
Texte complet
SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI : ATTENDU QUE L'ARTICLE 29 DU CODE ELECTORAL (ANCIEN ARTICLE 23 DU DECRET ORGANIQUE DU 2 FEVRIER 1852, MODIFIE PAR LA LOI DU 31 MARS 1914) DISPOSE QUE LE POURVOI EN MATIERE ELECTORALE EST DENONCE AU DEFENDEUR PAR SIMPLE LETTRE RECOMMANDEE ;
QUE CE TEXTE, S'IL N'EXCLUT PAS L'ETABLISSEMENT D'UN ACTE OU PROCES-VERBAL DRESSE PAR UN OFFICIER PUBLIC OU UN AGENT ASSERMENTE ET PORTANT NOTIFICATION DE CETTE DENONCIATION, NE PERMET PAS D'EFFECTUER LADITE DENONCIATION AUTREMENT QU'EN LA FORME QU'IL PREVOIT ;
ATTENDU EN L'ESPECE QUE LE POURVOI N'A PAS ETE DENONCE PAR LETTRE RECOMMANDEE, MAIS UNIQUEMENT PAR MINISTERE D'HUISSIER ;
DECLARE EN CONSEQUENCE LE POURVOI IRRECEVABLE. NO 61-60.013. Y... JEAN C/ X... MARCEL. PRESIDENT : M. BROUCHOT. - RAPPORTEUR : M. BOURCELIN. - AVOCAT GENERAL : M. LEMOINE. DANS LE MEME SENS : 13 JANVIER 1960, BULL. 1960, II, NO 31, P. 20 ET LES ARRETS CITES. 18 JANVIER 1961, BULL. 1961, II, NO 40, P. 31.