Breach of Contract and Termination Threshold

The case concerned a dispute arising from a contract where one party failed to execute the agreed-upon work, leading the other party to seek termination and damages. The lower court had found insufficient evidence to support the claim that the breach was significant enough to warrant termination under the terms of the contract. The highest court upheld this decision, reasoning that the refusal to execute the obligation must be sufficiently serious and definitive to justify the termination of the contract, and the factual findings of the lower court, indicating that the partial or delayed execution did not meet this threshold for non-performance, were not subject to review by the appellate court.