Seller v. Buyer: Land Sale Contract Validity Based on Area Discrepancy

The case involved a dispute over the validity of a contract concerning the sale of land, where the seller later sought to nullify the agreement by alleging a mistake regarding the true area of the property conveyed, which was allegedly smaller than represented. The court rejected the seller's appeal, reasoning that a mere quantitative difference in the size of the immovable property sold, without any indication of the true extent of the land or proof that the discrepancy was substantial enough to vitiate consent, does not constitute a legal ground for annulling the sale contract, particularly when the contract described the property by boundaries and not strictly by its area as the essential consideration.