Purchaser v. Seller: Latent Defect and Commencement of Prescription Period for Rescission of Sale
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA purchaser, having contracted to buy real estate, sought to cancel the sale after discovering the property was subject to a pre-existing, undisclosed usufruct, which significantly diminished its value, but the seller argued the discovery came too late under the applicable prescription period for exercising the remedy of rescission. The court held that the discovery of the undisclosed encumbrance constituted a latent defect, and since the purchaser was unaware of the usufruct until the encumbrance was established, the prescription period for seeking the nullity of the sale had not begun to run at the time the suit was filed, thus allowing the purchaser's claim to proceed.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAPurchaser v. Seller: Latent Defect and Commencement of Prescription Period for Rescission of Sale: The court held that the discovery of the undisclosed encumbrance constituted a latent defect, and since the purchaser was unaware of the usufruct until the encumbrance was established, the prescription period for seeking the nullity of the sale had not begun to run at the time the suit was filed, thus allowing the purchaser's claim to proceed.