Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
JURITEXT000006954915 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Lack of Notification

Numéro de cause JURITEXT000006954915
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal was declared inadmissible because the appellant failed to demonstrate that they had notified their appeal to the potential opposing party, thereby failing to comply with the requirements set forth in Article 23 of the Decree of February 2, 1852, which mandates such notification for admissibility.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 23 DU DECRET DU 2 FEVRIER 1852; Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Lack of Notification: The appeal was declared inadmissible because the appellant failed to demonstrate that they had notified their appeal to the potential opposing party, thereby failing to comply with the requirements set forth in Article 23 of the Decree of February 2, 1852, which mandates such notification for admissibility.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
notification de la décision qualité pour recourir avis des défauts tardif recours en carence production tardive de pièces droit de réponse

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 23 DU DECRET DU 2 FEVRIER 1852
The appeal was declared inadmissible because the requirements of this article regarding the notification of the appeal were not met.
Généré par l'IA
JURITEXT000006954167
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Improper Notification of Interested Parties
90-40137
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing Despite Notification Irregularities
JURITEXT000006954180
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Improper Service
JURITEXT000006954065
Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Failure to Meet Formal Requirements
03-70232
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Notification in Expropriation Case

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 23 DU DECRET DU 2 FEVRIER 1852

The appeal was declared inadmissible because the requirements of this article regarding the notification of the appeal were not met.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI : ATTENDU QUE LE DEMANDEUR NE JUSTIFIE PAS AVOIR DENONCE SON POURVOI AU DEFENDEUR EVENTUEL A LA CASSATION ;

QU'AINSI IL N'A PAS ETE SATISFAIT AUX PRESCRIPTIONS DE L'ARTICLE 23 DU DECRET DU 2 FEVRIER 1852 ;

DECLARE, EN CONSEQUENCE, LE POURVOI IRRECEVABLE. NO 60-60.050. BEAUFILS ET AUTRE C/ ARNOULD. PRESIDENT : M. CAMBOULIVES, CONSEILLER DOYEN, FAISANT FONCTIONS. - RAPPORTEUR : M. FURBY. - AVOCAT GENERAL : M. AMOR.