Former Owner Barred from Annulling Real Estate Adjudication Due to Failure to Object to Procedural Form and Deadlines
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAFollowing a judicial sale of real estate in 1941 that resulted in an adjudication, the former owner sought the annulment of the proceedings. The appellate court, whose decision was upheld, determined that the owner was barred from challenging the prior procedure because she failed to raise her objections regarding form and deadlines as strictly required by articles 727 and 728 of the Code of Civil Procedure, leading the high court to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that this specific procedural failure justified the refusal to annul the adjudication.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLES 727 ET 728 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, REJETTE LE POURVOI; Former Owner Barred from Annulling Real Estate Adjudication Due to Failure to Object to Procedural Form and Deadlines: The appellate court, whose decision was upheld, determined that the owner was barred from challenging the prior procedure because she failed to raise her objections regarding form and deadlines as strictly required by articles 727 and 728 of the Code of Civil Procedure, leading the high court to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that this specific procedural failure justified the refusal to annul the adjudication.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThese articles established the imperative prescription according to which the appellant was barred from challenging the prior procedure due to failing to meet the prescribed form and deadlines.
The Court dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning derived from Articles 727 and 728 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Texte complet
SUR LES DEUX MOYENS REUNIS : ATTENDU QU'UNE SAISIE IMMOBILIERE AYANT ETE PRATIQUEE LE 19 MARS 1939 SUR DES IMMEUBLES APPARTENANT A LA DAME X... DITE DE FAVOLS, SITUES A BARBOTAN-LES-THERMES, IL A ETE PROCEDE A LEUR ADJUDICATION, LE 29 JUILLET 1941, ET UN LOT A ETE ATTRIBUE A DONNEFOY ;
ATTENDU QUE, POUR DEBOUTER LA DAME X... DE FAVOLS DE SA DEMANDE EN NULLITE DE L'ADJUDICATION, L'ARRET CONFIRMATIF ATTAQUE A DECIDE QUE, SELON LES PRESCRIPTIONS IMPERATIVES DES ARTICLES 727 ET 728 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, L'APPELANTE SE TROUVAIT ACTUELLEMENT, FAUTE D'AVOIR FORMULE SES CRITIQUES DANS LA FORME ET LES DELAIS PREVUS PAR CES TEXTES, DECHUE PAR L'ADJUDICATION DE LA POSSIBILITE DE FAIRE ANNULER LA PROCEDURE ANTERIEURE ;
ATTENDU QUE CE MOTIF, QUI ADMET A BON DROIT QU'AUCUNE VOIE DE RECOURS N'ETAIT PLUS POSSIBLE, JUSTIFIE, A LUI SEUL, LA DECISION, TOUTE AUTRE CRITIQUE N'ETANT PLUS, DES LORS, SUSCEPTIBLE DE L'ATTEINDRE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 25 NOVEMBRE 1958 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL D'AGEN. NO 59-10.339. DAME X... C/ DONNEFOY. PRESIDENT : M. CAMBOULIVES, CONSEILLER DOYEN, FAISANT FONCTIONS. - RAPPORTEUR : M. DEJEAN DE LA BATIE. - PREMIER AVOCAT GENERAL : M. GAVALDA. - AVOCATS : MM. COUTARD ET DE SEGOGNE.