Purchaser v. Vendor: Sale by Measure vs. Specific Property Dispute

The case involves a dispute where a purchaser sought to have a sale declared void due to a significant discrepancy in the promised area of the property compared to the actual area, alleging the vendor's representations constituted deceit, while the vendor argued the sale was a corporeal property sale not based on area and that the purchaser had ample opportunity to verify the measurements. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the lower court correctly determined that the sale was one of a specific property, not strictly a sale by measure, and that the discrepancy, while notable, did not meet the legal threshold for nullity based on error or fraud given the purchaser's presumed knowledge or means to verify the property's dimensions prior to finalizing the agreement.