Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
JURITEXT000006954390 Généré par l'IA

Usufructuary Sale Void Against Bare Owner

Numéro de cause JURITEXT000006954390
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A contract for the sale of land, entered into by a seller who was only a usufructuary and not the bare owner, was held to be void because the seller lacked the necessary right to transfer full ownership, despite the buyer acting in good faith and being unaware of the limited nature of the seller's title; the court reasoned that the principle of *nemo dat quod non habet* (one cannot give what one does not have) applies, and a sale by a usufructuary purporting to transfer full ownership exceeds the limits of their rights, thus invalidating the contract as it relates to the property rights of the bare owner.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Usufructuary Sale Void Against Bare Owner: A contract for the sale of land, entered into by a seller who was only a usufructuary and not the bare owner, was held to be void because the seller lacked the necessary right to transfer full ownership, despite the buyer acting in good faith and being unaware of the limited nature of the seller's title; the court reasoned that the principle of *nemo dat quod non habet* (one cannot give what one does not have) applies, and a sale by a usufructuary purporting to transfer full ownership exceeds the limits of their rights, thus invalidating the contract as it relates to the property rights of the bare owner.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
vente régime de propriété bail à ferme bonne foi bien de stricte nécessité droit à la propriété
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet