Contract Formation Despite Disagreement on Delivery Date

The dispute centered on whether a contract for the sale of goods was validly formed despite a subsequent disagreement on the precise date of delivery, with the appellate court having upheld the lower court's decision confirming the sale's existence. The highest court quashed the decision, reasoning that a final agreement on the essential elements of the contract, specifically the object and the price, was established, and that while the delivery date was a secondary term, the absence of mutual consent on this specific point did not invalidate the entire contract where all other fundamental conditions were met, thereby contradicting the lower court's finding that the lack of agreement on delivery precluded contract formation.