Contract Validity and Implied Delivery Date in Sale of Movable Property

A party appealed a lower court's decision that upheld the validity of a contract for the sale of movable property, arguing that the absence of a specific date for the completion of the sale rendered the agreement void for uncertainty regarding the object's delivery timeline. The highest court quashed the lower court's ruling, reasoning that while the absence of a fixed deadline for delivery generally introduces uncertainty, if the contract otherwise contains clear and definitive terms regarding the object being sold, the omission of a delivery date does not automatically invalidate the agreement, as a reasonable timeframe can be implied by law or by the nature of the transaction.