Rescission Judgment Bars Subsequent Claims for Restitution and Damages
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA purchaser, having obtained a judgment for rescission of a sale due to latent defects and been ordered to return the purchased property, subsequently sought to recover the price paid and damages, but the court rejected this claim because the initial judgment, which dissolved the sale retroactively, implicitly ruled on all consequential claims arising from the breach, including the buyer's right to restitution of the price and damages, thereby precluding a subsequent, separate action on the same grounds.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IARescission Judgment Bars Subsequent Claims for Restitution and Damages: A purchaser, having obtained a judgment for rescission of a sale due to latent defects and been ordered to return the purchased property, subsequently sought to recover the price paid and damages, but the court rejected this claim because the initial judgment, which dissolved the sale retroactively, implicitly ruled on all consequential claims arising from the breach, including the buyer's right to restitution of the price and damages, thereby precluding a subsequent, separate action on the same grounds.