Appeal Regarding Enforcement Refusal Based on Arbitration Agreement Grounds

A party appealed a lower court decision that upheld the refusal to enforce an arbitral award, arguing the refusal was unjustified because the reasons provided by the enforcing court were not explicitly mentioned in the arbitration agreement, which was an annex to the main contract. The Court of Cassation rejected the appeal, reasoning that the requirement for grounds to refuse enforcement, as stipulated in the relevant procedural code, only demands that the enforcing court's decision itself be reasoned, not that the reasons for refusal must mirror specific grounds detailed within the arbitration agreement itself.