Termination of Predial Servitude Due to Alternative Access
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA property owner, having granted a right of passage over their land to an adjacent property to ensure access to a public road, sought to terminate this servitude, arguing that the benefited property owner had acquired a new means of access to the public road, thus rendering the original right unnecessary, but the court rejected this claim because the termination of a predial servitude based on the acquisition of an alternative access requires that the new access be both immediate and constantly usable without imposing any burden on the benefiting party, and the mere existence of a potentially usable secondary route did not automatically extinguish the established right of passage.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IATermination of Predial Servitude Due to Alternative Access: A property owner, having granted a right of passage over their land to an adjacent property to ensure access to a public road, sought to terminate this servitude, arguing that the benefited property owner had acquired a new means of access to the public road, thus rendering the original right unnecessary, but the court rejected this claim because the termination of a predial servitude based on the acquisition of an alternative access requires that the new access be both immediate and constantly usable without imposing any burden on the benefiting party, and the mere existence of a potentially usable secondary route did not automatically extinguish the established right of passage.