Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
JURITEXT000006952762 Généré par l'IA

Vendor v. Purchaser (Delivery Location Dispute)

Numéro de cause JURITEXT000006952762
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A vendor, having delivered goods, sued the purchaser for payment after the purchaser refused to pay based on a claim that the goods were not delivered at the agreed upon place, which the lower court rejected, finding that the purchaser's acceptance of the goods constituted a tacit agreement to the place of delivery, and the high court upheld this decision, reasoning that the lower court's finding was a matter of fact based on the purchaser's conduct and therefore could not be reviewed on appeal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Vendor v. Purchaser (Delivery Location Dispute): A vendor, having delivered goods, sued the purchaser for payment after the purchaser refused to pay based on a claim that the goods were not delivered at the agreed upon place, which the lower court rejected, finding that the purchaser's acceptance of the goods constituted a tacit agreement to the place of delivery, and the high court upheld this decision, reasoning that the lower court's finding was a matter of fact based on the purchaser's conduct and therefore could not be reviewed on appeal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
objet du litige longa manu traditio envoi d'une chose non commandée acheteur compétence en matière de contrats conclus par les consommateurs hypothèque légale du vendeur d'immeuble
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet