Vendor v. Purchaser (Delivery Location Dispute)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA vendor, having delivered goods, sued the purchaser for payment after the purchaser refused to pay based on a claim that the goods were not delivered at the agreed upon place, which the lower court rejected, finding that the purchaser's acceptance of the goods constituted a tacit agreement to the place of delivery, and the high court upheld this decision, reasoning that the lower court's finding was a matter of fact based on the purchaser's conduct and therefore could not be reviewed on appeal.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAVendor v. Purchaser (Delivery Location Dispute): A vendor, having delivered goods, sued the purchaser for payment after the purchaser refused to pay based on a claim that the goods were not delivered at the agreed upon place, which the lower court rejected, finding that the purchaser's acceptance of the goods constituted a tacit agreement to the place of delivery, and the high court upheld this decision, reasoning that the lower court's finding was a matter of fact based on the purchaser's conduct and therefore could not be reviewed on appeal.