Sale Agreement Validity Due to Alleged Error in Property Description

A dispute arose concerning the validity of a sale agreement where the seller subsequently claimed a lack of consent due to a supposed error regarding the essential qualities of the property sold, specifically its cadastral description, which was allegedly different from what was understood by the parties at the time of the agreement. The court held that such an error, if it relates to a specific, identifiable, and agreed-upon piece of property, does not constitute a legally recognized error vitiating consent because the object of the sale remains the specific property identified in the deed, regardless of minor inaccuracies in its supplementary description, thus affirming the validity of the sale.