Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
JURITEXT000006952558 Généré par l'IA

Unilateral Promise to Sell Breach and Damages

Numéro de cause JURITEXT000006952558
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige annulled

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A lower court had correctly ruled that a party to a contract, who had promised to sell a building to another party but subsequently sold it to a third party after the first party had made modifications to the building as agreed, was liable for damages because the original promise to sell was a unilateral promise to sell, not a bilateral sale agreement, and the seller's subsequent sale to a third party constituted a breach of that promise, which entitled the initial promisee to compensation for the loss suffered.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unilateral Promise to Sell Breach and Damages: A lower court had correctly ruled that a party to a contract, who had promised to sell a building to another party but subsequently sold it to a third party after the first party had made modifications to the building as agreed, was liable for damages because the original promise to sell was a unilateral promise to sell, not a bilateral sale agreement, and the seller's subsequent sale to a third party constituted a breach of that promise, which entitled the initial promisee to compensation for the loss suffered.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
vente contrat unilatéral responsabilité de l'assuré violation positive du contrat droit des obligations contrat bilatéral
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet