Landlord v. Tenant: Tacit Renewal of Agricultural Lease

A property owner, having leased land for agricultural use under a written contract, sued the tenant for eviction following the tenant's refusal to vacate after the lease term expired, while the tenant contested the eviction based on the customary right to tacit renewal of agricultural leases under the relevant rural code provisions, arguing the written contract did not contain a clause explicitly excluding such renewal. The court rejected the appeal, affirming that the written lease agreement, unless explicitly containing a clause contrary to the tacit renewal provisions of the rural code, is subject to the customary right of tacit renewal upon the lease term's end, meaning the landlord could not unilaterally enforce eviction based solely on the contract's expiration date when the statutory right applied.