Contract Dispute Over Alleged Vice of Consent Regarding Delivery Quantity

The case involved a dispute arising from a contract where one party, having provided goods, sought payment from the other party who contested the validity of the agreement by alleging a vice of consent concerning the quantity delivered. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the trial court correctly determined that the alleged error regarding the quantity did not constitute a decisive factor vitiating the consent of the contracting party, as the essential obligation to pay for the delivered goods remained valid and enforceable despite the purported discrepancy in quantity.