Court held that natural use requirement for temporary lease is met even if land nature changed from crown to tax land.

The Supreme Court allowed the claim regarding the natural use requirement for a temporary lease under the Act on Objection to Land Law and Correction of Real Estate. The plaintiff argued that the land's nature had changed from crown land to tax land, potentially violating lease conditions. The court decided that the change in land status did not negate the requirement of natural use, as the land remained suitable for its intended agricultural purpose.