Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 962/2003 AI generated

Supreme Court held that land nature change from crown to tax land does not automatically satisfy lease term requirements.

Case Number KKO 962/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the validity of a lease term under Finnish law. The appellant argued that the lease was invalid because the land's nature changed from crown land to tax land, failing a specific statutory condition. The court ruled that such a change in land status does not automatically satisfy the legal prerequisites for the lease term's validity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Lain 21 § 1 momentin (86/1930) mukaisen määräaikaisen nautinnan edellytyksistä: Tilan luonnon muutaminen kruununmaasta veromaaksi ei automaattisesti täytä lain edellytyksiä määräaikaisen nautinnan voimassaololle.

Keywords

AI generated
lease term validity land nature change crown land status tax land classification statutory prerequisites Supreme Court ruling agricultural lease law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Lain 21 § 1 momentin (86/1930)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO:2003:43
Supreme Court allows county to reclaim land after 10 years, rejecting private ownership claim based on possession.
AI generated
kko-other_2003_958
Court held that changing land from crown to tax land does not satisfy the requirement for temporary use under the 1930 Act.
kko-other_2003_959
Court held that changing land from crown to tax land does not automatically satisfy lease conditions.
kko-other_2003_955
Court held that natural use of land as crown land is not required for lease validity if land nature changed to tax land.
kko-other_2003_960
Court allows lease termination when land nature changed from crown land to tax land under specific statutory conditions.
kko-other_2003_961
Court held that changing land from crown to tax land does not satisfy the requirement for temporary use under the 1930 Act.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys lainhuudatuksesta ja kiinteistönsaannon moittimisajasta annetun lain 21 §:n 1 momentin (86/1930) mukaisen määräaikaisen nautinnan edellytyksistä, kun tilan luonto oli muutettu kruununmaasta veromaaksi.

Ks. KKO:2003:43