Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 960/2003 AI generated

Court allows lease termination when land nature changed from crown land to tax land under specific statutory conditions.

Case Number KKO 960/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court allowed the tenant's request to terminate the fixed-term lease due to a change in the land's legal status. The tenant argued that the land's nature had shifted from crown land to tax land, violating the lease's underlying conditions. The court ruled that this fundamental change in the land's character justified the termination under the relevant statute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Lain 21 § 1 momentin (86/1930) mukaisen määräaikaisen nautinnan edellytyksistä: Kun tilan luonto muuttuu kruununmaasta veromaaksi, nautinnan edellytykset eivät enää täyty, jolloin vuokranantaja voi hylätä nautinnan.

Keywords

AI generated
lease termination crown land tax land land nature change fixed-term lease statutory conditions tenant rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Lain 21 § 1 momentin (86/1930)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO:2003:43
Supreme Court allows county to reclaim land after 10 years, rejecting private ownership claim based on possession.
AI generated
kko-other_2003_962
Supreme Court held that land nature change from crown to tax land does not automatically satisfy lease term requirements.
kko-other_2003_958
Court held that changing land from crown to tax land does not satisfy the requirement for temporary use under the 1930 Act.
kko-other_2003_956
Court held that changing land from crown to tax land does not automatically satisfy the requirement for a fixed-term lease under the 1930 Act.
kko-other_2003_963
Court held that natural use requirement for temporary lease is met even if land nature changed from crown to tax land.
kko-other_2003_961
Court held that changing land from crown to tax land does not satisfy the requirement for temporary use under the 1930 Act.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys lainhuudatuksesta ja kiinteistönsaannon moittimisajasta annetun lain 21 §:n 1 momentin (86/1930) mukaisen määräaikaisen nautinnan edellytyksistä, kun tilan luonto oli muutettu kruununmaasta veromaaksi.

Ks. KKO:2003:43