Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
KKO 957/2003 AI generated

Court held that nature change from crown land to tax land does not automatically satisfy lease term requirements.

Case Number KKO 957/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the validity of a lease term under Finnish law. The appellant argued that the lease was invalid because the land's nature changed from crown land to tax land, altering the original conditions. The court ruled that such a change in land status does not automatically negate the statutory requirements for the lease term's validity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Lain 21 § 1 momentin (86/1930) mukainen määräaikainen nautinta; muutos tilan luontoon kruununmaasta veromaaksi ei automaattisesti moista nautintaa.

Keywords

AI generated
lease term validity crown land status tax land conversion nature change requirement statutory lease conditions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Lain lainhuudatuksesta ja kiinteistönsaannon moittimisajasta annetun lain 21 § 1 momentin (86/1930)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO:2003:43
Supreme Court allows county to reclaim land after 10 years, rejecting private ownership claim based on possession.
AI generated
kko-other_2003_964
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding lease term extension when land nature changed from crown to tax land.
kko-other_2003_961
Court held that changing land from crown to tax land does not satisfy the requirement for temporary use under the 1930 Act.
kko-other_2003_959
Court held that changing land from crown to tax land does not automatically satisfy lease conditions.
kko-other_2003_955
Court held that natural use of land as crown land is not required for lease validity if land nature changed to tax land.
kko-other_2003_954
Court held that nature change from crown land to tax land does not automatically satisfy lease term requirements.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys lainhuudatuksesta ja kiinteistönsaannon moittimisajasta annetun lain 21 §:n 1 momentin (86/1930) mukaisen määräaikaisen nautinnan edellytyksistä, kun tilan luonto oli muutettu kruununmaasta veromaaksi.

Ks. KKO:2003:43