Court held that changing land from crown to tax land does not automatically satisfy the requirement for a fixed-term lease under the 1930 Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the validity of a fixed-term lease under the 1930 Act. The appellant argued that the lease was valid because the land's nature changed from crown land to tax land, satisfying the statutory conditions. The court ruled that such a change in land status does not automatically fulfill the specific requirements for a fixed-term lease under the cited law.