Court held that natural use of land as crown land is not required for lease validity if land nature changed to tax land.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Finland allowed the appeal regarding the validity of a lease under the Act on Objection to Statutory Leases and Revocation of Land Conveyances. The plaintiff argued that the lease was void because the land's nature had changed from crown land to tax land, violating the requirement of natural use. The court decided that the change in land status did not invalidate the lease since the statutory requirement of natural use was not breached by the administrative reclassification.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedAct on Objection to Statutory Leases and Revocation of Land Conveyances s. 21 (1); The requirement of natural use of land does not preclude a lease if the land's nature has been altered from crown land to tax land by administrative decision.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys lainhuudatuksesta ja kiinteistönsaannon moittimisajasta annetun lain 21 §:n 1 momentin (86/1930) mukaisen määräaikaisen nautinnan edellytyksistä, kun tilan luonto oli muutettu kruununmaasta veromaaksi.
Ks. KKO:2003:43