Legislator Case Law & Legislation
KKO 955/2003 AI generated

Court held that natural use of land as crown land is not required for lease validity if land nature changed to tax land.

Case Number KKO 955/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the appeal regarding the validity of a lease under the Act on Objection to Statutory Leases and Revocation of Land Conveyances. The plaintiff argued that the lease was void because the land's nature had changed from crown land to tax land, violating the requirement of natural use. The court decided that the change in land status did not invalidate the lease since the statutory requirement of natural use was not breached by the administrative reclassification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Act on Objection to Statutory Leases and Revocation of Land Conveyances s. 21 (1); The requirement of natural use of land does not preclude a lease if the land's nature has been altered from crown land to tax land by administrative decision.

Keywords

AI generated
natural use requirement crown land status tax land classification lease validity administrative reclassification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Act on Objection to Statutory Leases and Revocation of Land Conveyances s. 21 (1)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kysymys lainhuudatuksesta ja kiinteistönsaannon moittimisajasta annetun lain 21 §:n 1 momentin (86/1930) mukaisen määräaikaisen nautinnan edellytyksistä, kun tilan luonto oli muutettu kruununmaasta veromaaksi.

Ks. KKO:2003:43