Court held that nature change from crown land to tax land does not automatically satisfy lease term requirements.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the validity of a lease term under Finnish law. The appellant argued that the land's transformation from crown land to tax land altered the necessary conditions for the lease. The court ruled that such a change in land status does not constitute a valid reason to invalidate the agreed lease period.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedLain 21 §:n 1 momentin (86/1930) mukaisen määräaikaisen nautinnan edellytyksistä: A change in the nature of land from crown land to tax land does not automatically satisfy the requirements for a fixed-term lease.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys lainhuudatuksesta ja kiinteistönsaannon moittimisajasta annetun lain 21 §:n 1 momentin (86/1930) mukaisen määräaikaisen nautinnan edellytyksistä, kun tilan luonto oli muutettu kruununmaasta veromaaksi.
Ks. KKO:2003:43