Supreme Court allows return claim in rehabilitation proceedings when rehabilitation is deemed impossible.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court permitted the applicant's claim for return to their home country following a rehabilitation procedure. The applicant argued that rehabilitation was futile due to the deteriorating condition of their home country, while the opposing party contended that the procedure had been completed. The court ruled that when rehabilitation is objectively impossible, the legal basis for the stay of deportation must be reassessed, allowing the return claim to proceed.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedYSL 35 § 3 mom; When rehabilitation procedures are deemed impossible due to the deteriorating conditions in the home country, the legal basis for the stay of deportation is no longer valid, permitting the return claim.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys oikeudesta vaatia takaisinsaantia saneerausmenettelyssä.
Ks. KKO:1995:130
YSL 35 § 3 mom