Shareholder's right to intervene in company litigation dismissed as no direct legal interest established.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the shareholder's application to intervene in the company's litigation regarding the dissolution of the company. The shareholder argued that the outcome would affect their investment value, but the court found no direct legal interest sufficient for intervention. Consequently, the court ruled that only parties with a direct legal stake in the specific dispute may intervene.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedLaki osakeyhtiöstä 609/1961, 10 luku; Laki oikeudenkäyntijärjestystä 731/1928, 10 luku: A shareholder lacks the right to intervene in company litigation unless they demonstrate a direct legal interest in the specific outcome of the proceedings.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kysymys osakkeenomistajan väliintulo-oikeudesta osakeyhtiötä koskevassa oikeudenkäynnissä.
Ks. KKO:1995:213