Claim for Continuation of Unilateral Advances Denied
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA party sought to confirm and continue receiving advances previously provided by the opposing party, which had been consistently confirmed until a recent cessation; the court ruled that the established practice of making advances was unilaterally terminated by the party who ceased making them, and since there was no express contractual obligation or other legal basis compelling the continuation of these advances, the claim to reinstate them was denied.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAClaim for Continuation of Unilateral Advances Denied: A party sought to confirm and continue receiving advances previously provided by the opposing party, which had been consistently confirmed until a recent cessation; the court ruled that the established practice of making advances was unilaterally terminated by the party who ceased making them, and since there was no express contractual obligation or other legal basis compelling the continuation of these advances, the claim to reinstate them was denied.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
cause No A/598/1995 - IP
### [[pjdoc 9688]](/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1879637) du 12.12.1995
Descripteurs : OBLIGATION D'ENTRETIEN; AVANCE(EN GENERAL); SUPPRESSION(EN GENERAL)
Normes : LARPA.11
Résumé : Cessation des avances confirmées.
Pas de document HTML