ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.263.068
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.263.068
Généré par l'IA
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Conseil d'État dismissed the applicant's asylum application, ruling that the evidence presented did not establish a well-founded fear of persecution. The applicant argued for protection based on past discrimination, but the court found no credible threat of future harm in Switzerland. Consequently, the claim was rejected as it lacked the necessary factual basis required for asylum recognition.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 50-1 al. 1 LIA; Art. 50-2 al. 1 LIA: An asylum claim is rejected when the applicant fails to substantiate a well-founded fear of persecution with credible and specific evidence.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
asylum application
well-founded fear
Conseil d'État
persecution evidence
LIA provisions
Swiss asylum law
discretionary rejection
autorisations de séjour
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 50-1 al. 1 LIA
Art. 50-2 al. 1 LIA
Décisions connexes
Généré par l'IAECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.255.989
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.243.204
Belgian court annuls disciplinary dismissal due to unreasonable delay in initiating criminal proceedings.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.253.590
Court annuls dismissal decision due to failure to notify master of internship of termination proposal.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.253.771
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2017:ARR.239.953
Belgian administrative court dismisses appeal against disciplinary dismissal for failure to prove procedural bias.
Texte complet
Fiche
Entscheid 263.068 von 24 April 2025
Thesaurus CAS:
CONSEIL D'ETAT
UTU Thesaurus:
DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF - CONSEIL D'ÉTAT - Arrêts (Conseil d'État)