ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.258.357
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2024:ARR.258.357
Généré par l'IA
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Conseil d'État dismissed the applicant's asylum request, ruling that the evidence presented did not establish a well-founded fear of persecution. The applicant argued for protection based on past discrimination, but the court found no credible threat of future harm in Switzerland. Consequently, the application was rejected as it lacked the necessary factual basis for granting asylum.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 50-1 al. 1 LAA; Art. 50-2 LAA: An asylum claim is rejected when the applicant fails to substantiate a well-founded fear of persecution or serious harm in the host country.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
asylum claim
well-founded fear
Conseil d'État
LAA provisions
persecution evidence
autorisations de séjour
séjour illégal
durée minimale de séjour
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 50-1 al. 1 LAA
Art. 50-2 LAA
Décisions connexes
Généré par l'IAECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.242.775
DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF - CONSEIL D'ÉTAT - Arrêts (Conseil d'État)
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.241.419
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2021:ARR.252.328
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.256.592
Constitutional complaint dismissed; administrative act upheld as lawful under Swiss public law principles.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.257.440
Court dismisses appeal against regional investment grant denial due to insufficient evidence of market overlap between companies.
Texte complet
Fiche
Entscheid 258.357 von 8 Januar 2024
Thesaurus CAS:
CONSEIL D'ETAT
UTU Thesaurus:
DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF - CONSEIL D'ÉTAT - Arrêts (Conseil d'État)