ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.255.989
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2023:ARR.255.989
Généré par l'IA
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Conseil d'État dismissed the applicant's asylum request, ruling that the evidence presented did not establish a well-founded fear of persecution. The applicant argued for protection based on past discrimination, but the court found no credible threat in the current Swiss context. Consequently, the application was rejected as it lacked the necessary substantiation required under Swiss asylum law.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 100a LPA; Art. 100b LPA: An asylum claim is rejected when the applicant fails to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution or serious harm in the host country.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
asylum claim
well-founded fear
Conseil d'État
Swiss asylum law
persecution evidence
risque de séjour illégal
autorisation de séjour de courte durée
absence prolongée du pays
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 100a LPA
Art. 100b LPA
Décisions connexes
Généré par l'IAECLI:BE:RVSCE:2025:ARR.263.068
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.253.590
Court annuls dismissal decision due to failure to notify master of internship of termination proposal.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.253.771
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2017:ARR.239.953
Belgian administrative court dismisses appeal against disciplinary dismissal for failure to prove procedural bias.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2021:ARR.251.909
Constitutional complaint dismissed; administrative act upheld as lawful under Swiss Federal Constitution.
Texte complet
Fiche
Entscheid 255.989 von 9 März 2023
Thesaurus CAS:
CONSEIL D'ETAT
UTU Thesaurus:
DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF - CONSEIL D'ÉTAT - Arrêts (Conseil d'État)