ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.254.895
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.254.895
Généré par l'IA
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Conseil d'État dismissed the applicant's asylum application, ruling that the evidence presented did not establish a well-founded fear of persecution. The applicant argued for protection based on past experiences, but the court found no credible threat in the current Swiss context. Consequently, the claim was rejected as it lacked the necessary factual basis for granting asylum under Swiss law.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 100a al. 1 LIA; Art. 100b LIA: An asylum claim is rejected when the applicant fails to substantiate a well-founded fear of persecution with credible and specific evidence.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
asylum application
well-founded fear
Conseil d'État
protection status
evidence standard
persecution claim
Swiss asylum law
autorisations de séjour
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 100a al. 1 LIA
Art. 100b LIA
Décisions connexes
Généré par l'IAECLI:BE:RVSCE:2021:ARR.252.126
Constitutional complaint dismissed; administrative act upheld as lawful under Swiss public law principles.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2017:ARR.240.202
Belgian Council of State annuls royal order for refusing military training reimbursement due to insufficient administrative motivation.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2017:ARR.240.335
Constitutional court annuls royal order refusing military officer exemption from training fee reimbursement.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2022:ARR.253.771
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
ECLI:BE:RVSCE:2018:ARR.241.419
Conseil d'État dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove well-founded fear of persecution in Switzerland.
Texte complet
Fiche
Entscheid 254.895 von 26 Oktober 2022
Thesaurus CAS:
CONSEIL D'ETAT
UTU Thesaurus:
DROIT PUBLIC ET ADMINISTRATIF - CONSEIL D'ÉTAT - Arrêts (Conseil d'État)